Over the past few weeks, I’ve been burning through all six seasons of HBO’s ‘Oz.’ In a nutshell, the program follows a large group of inmates in a fictional maximum security correctional facility in an unnamed U.S. state. Within the Oswald State Correctional Facility – or “Oz” as it’s known on the street – exists a place called “Emerald City” (aka “Em City”).
Em City is an experimental unit within the prison where inmates are allowed to wear their own clothes, interact with each other and work at jobs within the prison on the conditions that they attend classes and rehabilitation counselling, to name a few particulars. What’s most interesting about the cell block is that Aryans, Spanish, Irish, Muslims and a number of other ethnic groups attempt to co-exist together. Beyond that, I’ll not say anything because there are several people I know who have recently been turned on to the show and I would hate to ruin anything for any of them.

Photo: Ughman on Flickr
Yes, I do realize that this show is a work of fiction. At the end of each day, I’m sure the characters each washed off their “tattoos” before going home to their wives and children to prepare for another day’s work. However, it is the raw reality of humanity that this program touched on through actors (who are incredibly symbolic of you, me and the people before and behind you) that moved me in my core. And while none of it is true, the show is based on truth – human truth. The dialogue and the events quite literally force one to re-examine what we hold tight to through watching others experience similar circumstances.
“There are some confessions you can’t even make to yourself. Yearnings, desires, that you admitted to having you’d had to stop being who you are. And the facade you build so carefully will crumble, exposing to those around you, what really makes you tick.”
Last night I watched the very final episodes, and what I came to realize in those last few hours was, simply put, devastating. In one of the final episodes, tensions arose over the fate of a prisoner who was being held on death row and whether or not it was “ethical” to execute him as had been ordered by the State.
As the clock ticked down and straps were fastened, I found myself suddenly in a pool of my own tears as I sat there on my living room floor. I cried. I cried harder than I have in months, my body heaving in sobs.

Photo: Prof. Jas. Mundie on Flickr
That humanity I spoke of – the raw reality of it – it’s something that is too quickly defined without any true consideration. As I sat watching that particular scene, what struck me opened up a floodgate that brought out the heavy grief. Different values are placed on different lives, and each time, the basis for that evaluation is unique.
Let’s say one man takes another man’s life and so it’s considered by some as justifiable to strap him to a chair and thrust electric currents through his body or pump his arm full of venomous toxins. It’s a sense of redemption to the family of the man who was killed. But what about the executed man’s family? Are they not left with the same void?
And while I know the death penalty isn’t a method of punishment used in Canada, it’s wide-spread in many areas of the United States and many, many countries around the world. However, my point here is not about whether or not it’s okay to sentence someone to die. My point is that what matters most is to look behind the moral wrongdoing and look at the person. This very idea is what watching ‘Oz’ has prompted me to do.

Photo: Hotel Lyric [35] on Flickr
While it’s true that prisons are packed full of murderers, arsonists, rapists and the like, at the heart of the matter, they are all still people whether men or women. Behind the moral wrongdoings are sons and daughters, people with heart and true emotions. Somewhere along the way, their moral compasses became scrambled – even if only for a moment – and has changed their lives completely.
“So, what have we learned? What’s the lesson for today? For all the never-ending days and restless nights in Oz? That morality is transient? That virtue cannot exist without violence? That to be honest is to be flawed? That the giving and taking of love both debases and elevates us? That God or Allah or Yahweh has answers to questions we dare not even ask? The story is simple: a man lives in prison and dies. How he dies? That’s easy. The who and the why is the complex part. The human part. The only part worth knowing…”
It is so easy and quick to judge and label these “criminals and scumbags,” but are those of us on the outside really that much better than these people? Who of us has not lied to our loved ones, stolen, cheated, raged or delighted in our own dances with malice?
If there were laws against such trespasses of the heart, we would all be guilty.
Don't forget to follow me on Twitter!|
10 Comments
|
This topic has been touched on recently regarding the man in Merritt who allegedly killed his three children in cold blood. People are crying to tougher sentencing and punishments in Canada – even the death penalty for anyone who kills a child. But then where does the line get drawn? “Hmm he killed 2 people but they were older so it’s not worth the same punishment”… it can get a little crazy.
I say allegedly in italics because he hasn’t yet been through the court process although all signs point to him.
I love this quote from Ghandi, which, to me, sums up how I feel on this issue.
“an eye for an eye makes the whole world blind.”
Oz was a great HBO series. Perhaps one of the best. Practically every single episode had a lesson that I felt was important/thought provoking (most often told explicitly by the narrator (Hill)).
I think you summed it up very well!
All sins are equal in God’s eyes, so we aren’t any better than them.
Wow, I had no clue Oz was still on. It must have been playing forever because I remember watching it when I was back in the states.
As for the death penalty, I used to be torn on it but I find myself leaning against it now. Mainly for the following reasons:
1) If someone is deemed guilty and found later not to be so (which happens a lot more often than you would like to think), it is a horrible thing but at least they can be released and compensated to the extent possible. With the death penalty, there is no turning back.
2) I find a bit of hypocrisy in killing someone for killing.
3) As you said, I think the death penalty is an unfair burden to put on the prisoner’s family.
4) Related to (3), I think in someways the death penalty is an “easy out” for the person who commits the crime, and the real punishment is put on people who don’t deserver it. Ideally, I think life sentences should be enforced. People shouldn’t just get out after 10 years or so. And I also think people on a life sentence should have to work for their food and stay there and not depend on the taxpayers. Ultimately all of us people who haven’t committed a crime have to do the same thing so I don’t think that’s unfair to demand.
Now is all this actually realistic? Maybe not. But that’s my take on it.
I believe that people can change, and that people need to WANT to change. Some crimes deserve a second chance and others (murder in my opinion) deserve strict life sentences.
Who are we though to try and decide right from wrong… our system seems to fail over and over again.
Interesting to see in those countries where even the smallest theft is punished with death there is very very little crime. (other than the corrupt government of course)
I agree with Scott and would like to see those people in prison actually working, and I also think real life sentences should be enforced. Murderers getting out after 5-10 years is rediculous.
I also agree with Scott regarding having to spend the rest of their lives behind bars and working for their food. For a capitol crime, loss of ALL freedoms should be the punishment rather than death.
I concur with Phaedra 100% and with Scott and Kat. A life for a life is NOT the way to go.
[...] Clearly, the two dance very intimately in the culmination that is HBO’s Oz. I’ve said enough about it that nothing else is left to [...]